REPORT OF THE GRAINS WORKING GROUP1
(Rice, Sorghum and Wheat)

Donna Mitten
AgrEvo USA

Group Members

Paul Arriola, Elmhurst College, gene flow in sorghum
Miguel Borges, USDA-EMBRAPA, insect ecology
Donald Duvick, Iowa State University, plant breeding
David Gealy, National Rice Germplasm Center, USDA, red rice
Marie Jasieniuk, Montana State University, weed ecology and evolution
Johnie Jenkins, USDA-ARS, plant breeding
Nicholas Jordan, University of Minnesota, weed science, genetics, and ecology
Brigit Loos, RIVM/CSR/BGGO, The Netherlands, regulatory affairs<
Donna Mitten (Group Leader), AgrEvo USA, rice agronomy and regulatory affairs
Maria Jose Sampaio, EMBRAPA, Brazilian agriculture


CROP TO WEED GENE FLOW

The grains working group identified three crops which have sexually compatible weedy relatives likely to be subject to gene flow in US agricultural systems (Table 1).

Table 1. Crop-weed complexes considered by the working group.

Crop

Weed

Relative likelihood of outcrossing

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

Johnsongrass (S. halepense), Shattercane (S. bicolor), Sudan grass (S. bicolor)

High

Rice (Oryza sativa)

Red rice (Oryza sativa)

Moderate

Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), Volunteer rye (Secale cereale), Wheatgrasses (Agropyron sp., Elymus sp).

Low


The ease of cross pollination and the successful production of a fertile hybrid vary with each case. If the selective advantage of an introduced trait is positive, however, introgression of the new trait into an existing weed population is possible. The risk of ecological harm is then dependent upon the habitat of the weed. In the crop-weed complexes considered here, in which the habitat of the weedy relative is limited to agricultural systems, the chance that a new trait may threaten natural ecosystems is not likely.

Crop-companion weed complexes often have a common progenitor and a parallel evolution (Harlan 1992). None of our three examples are native to North America; the cultivated crop and the weed relative were introduced into US agriculture at the same time. Rice and wheat seed imported for planting also contained seed of the weed. Sorghum, johnsongrass, and sudan grass were independently introduced into US agriculture as forage crops. See Annex 1 for more detailed background information on each of the crop and weed complexes.

Wheat and rice in the US have a 150 year history. The original seeds were often land races from Europe and Asia. These land races were grown in different areas of the US, and seed of those that produced a sustainable crop was saved. For the first half of the 20th century, genetics-based plant breeding aimed for high yielding varieties. In the last 50 years, improved varieties have been introduced that include pest resistance genes derived from related germplasm collections, and dwarf varieties derived from induced mutations. Changes in plant stature have been important for the mechanization of agriculture.

As agricultural management practices change, crop-companion weeds are subjected to strong selection pressures. Addition of certain new genes transferred from a crop relative could enhance the adaptability of the weed species. To date, however, there has been no evidence that the introgression of a pest resistance trait has exacerbated a weed problem in a sorghum, rice, or wheat agricultural system. Modern agriculture does have experience with weed populations developing resistance to herbicides. Intensive use of herbicides in continuous cropping operations, combined with little rotation among different herbicide chemistries, has resulted in the selection for resistant individuals in weed populations. Selection for resistance can be very fast when herbicides with long residual activity are in continuous use (Heap 1998). The impact of herbicide resistance has been managed by changing agricultural practices. The working group did not see potential adverse effects outside agricultural systems because the companion weeds remain contained within the cultivated system, with the exception of wheatgrasses in rangelands and conservation areas.

BREEDING FOR PEST RESISTANCE TRAITS IN THE US

Rice
Fungal pathogens cause the most important diseases of rice in the US (Table 2).

Table 2. Important pests of rice in the US and current efforts to provide resistance.

Rice pests in US

Approach to resistance

Blast (Pyricularia orzyzae Cav.)

Germplasm and genomics; Enhancement of native resistance mechanisms via molecular biology

Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia sloani Kuhn)

Germplasm limited

Stem rot (Sclerotium oryzae Catt.)

Related species

Rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophillus Kushel)

Germplasm

Bacterial leaf blight *

rDNA

Rhizoctonia*

rDNA

Insect resistance for lepidopteran and coleopteran pests*

rDNA for potato proteinase inhibitor II and various Bt toxins.

* Genetically engineered pest resistant rice field tested in the US as of 1998.


In other parts of the world, bacterial and viral diseases have a greater impact on rice culture. Blast (Pyricularia orzyzae Cav.) is the most important rice disease worldwide and the key fungal disease in the US. There are many races of the blast pathogen, and blast resistant rice germplasm is primarily race specific (McKenzie et al. 1994). Members of the gene family conferring blast resistance, identified by the rice genomics project, are being used to study the mechanism of plant response to pathogens (Ronald 1997). It may not be long before genes for both race-specific and more general disease resistance will be available for evaluation in rice.

Wheat
The Proceedings of the 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium provides an extensive list of genes for disease resistance in use by wheat breeding programs (Table 3).

Table 3. Important pests of wheat in the US and current efforts to provide resistance.

Wheat pests in US

Approach to resistance

Leaf rust (Puccinia recondita)

Stem rust (P. graminin)

Related germplasm, Lophopyron and Triticum triaristatum

Wheat powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis)

Germplasm

Fusarium, Septoria and general fungal resistance*

rDNA for chitinase and glucanase genes

WSMV and BYDV*

rDNA

* Genetically engineered pest resistant wheat field tested in the US as of 1998.

The information may be accessed at: http://www.extension.usask.ca/Publications/Ulearn/wheat_genetics_symp.html. It was noted that wheat already contains disease resistance genes for chitinase and glucanase, but increased expression or alternative timing may be achieved by rDNA technology.

In a reference document prepared by the OECD (Cook et al. 1993), the section on wheat cites eyespot resistance. The Pch gene for eyespot resistance was transferred to hexaploid wheat by a wide cross from Aegilops ventricosa. By outcrossing, the Pch gene could be transferred from wheat to jointed goatgrass, A. cylindrica, a related weed that is a host for eyespot fungus. According to this document, if jointed goatgrass acquired the Pch gene from wheat, it would not become a more important weed, but rather become a less important host for eyespot disease. However, members of our working group questioned what is really known of the negative impacts of disease on jointed goatgrass populations. The second statement in the OECD reference document may simply be opinion and is not documented by ecological studies.

Sorghum
The working group could not identify any effort to use biotechnology to improve pest resistance in sorghum. The USDA has not reported any authorizations for rDNA sorghum field trials as of the end of 1998. Current efforts to increase resistance to pests are based upon plant breeding and germplasm (Table 4).

Table 4. Important pests of sorghum in the US and current efforts to provide resistance.*

Sorghum pests in US

Approach to resistance

Smut (Sphacelotheca sorghi)

simple recessive

Leaf anthracnose (Colletotrichum graminicolum)

simple dominant

Red stem rot (Colletotrichum graminicolum)

simple dominant

Rust (Puccinia purpurea)

simple dominant

Sugar-cane mosaic virus (SCMV)

simple dominant

Chinch-bug (Blissus leucopterus)

possible simple dominant

Corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis)

possible simple dominant

* Sorghum bicolor resistances reported from traditional breeding (Doggett, 1988)

GENERAL FINDINGS ON THE IMPACT OF PEST RESISTANCE TRAITS

The working group asked the question, "Can we apply the successful strategies learned from monocultured crop/weed complexes in managed agro-systems to weeds in the wild?" The consensus was No; these sets of data do not exist and would require difficult and lengthy research to gather. On the other hand, there are inferential data sets that may be derived from floristic survey and weed census reports. For example, in a review for the OECD background paper on plant breeding (Cook et al. 1993), the authors note that easily recognized wheat traits such as red coleoptile and pubescent leaves have never been reported in populations of jointed goat grass.

RECOMMENDATIONS ON INFORMATION NEEDED TO ASSESS RISK

Genes From the Same Gene Pool Are Low Risk.
Low risk gene pools, represented by conventional breeding and genomics programs, are generally characterized and predictable.

More Information is Needed on Genes From Diverse Sources.
Information should be acquired on the action of the resistance gene and its range of target organisms. Studies are needed to screen the weed population for pests, e.g., employ breeders’ disease nursery, or compile field observations concerning pest infestations of the weed. If resistance is already present in the weed, the potential risk from gene flow is low. If resistance is not present, researchers must determine pest impacts on weed population dynamics. If no impact is found, then again the risk is low. If the pest does have an impact on weed dynamics, then the number of individuals in the population with and without the pest should be measured and fitness traits suitable for the weed should be scored. If fitness or population dynamics are affected to a large extent, then hybrid studies may be conducted.

Post Commercial Release Studies Can Provide Valuable Information.
The working group recognized that the first five years of a commercial release provide a unique opportunity for risk assessment on a larger scale. The group recommended that the USDA Risk Assessment Research Grants Program fund post-commercial release studies to identify and collect data in the first five year period. The data should be specific for the crop/weed/trait combination and include input from ecologists, weed scientists, and breeders. Important parameters to measure are changes in both number and distribution of weed populations. Once the appropriate data is identified, it should be communicated to target researchers, especially those in extension, crop associations, conservation staffers, and plant breeders who will be working with the new crops. Such information will prove useful for guiding the design of future releases and research.

 

ANNEX I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR EACH CROP-WEED COMPLEX

The Sorghum – Johnsongrass Complex. (Prepared by Paul Arriola)
Three compatible relatives of crop sorghum grow in the US, Sorghum sudanense, S. almum, and S. halepense. Of these three, S. halepense, or johnsongrass, is of greatest concern because of its aggressive weedy habit. Johnsongrass is considered to be one of the world's ten worst weed pests (Holm et al. 1977). A native of the southeastern Mediterranean region and Eurasia, it was introduced to the southeastern US as a forage crop sometime before 1830 (McWhorter 1971). Johnsongrass has since developed into an aggressive colonizing weed that has spread throughout most of the continental United States. It is a noxious weed pest for North American agriculture and is reported to be commonly found in crops such as maize, grain sorghum, soybean, cotton, grapes, potato, and sugar cane (Bridges and Baumann 1992). Johnsongrass has continued to spread throughout the southern and western United States, and over-wintering ecotypes are expanding northward into Canada (Warwick 1990).

The biology of johnsongrass has been well described. Although it reproduces and spreads principally by rhizomes, johnsongrass can reproduce sexually by producing selfed, or outcrossed seed with nearby compatible relatives (see Warwick and Black 1983). It is generally tetraploid (2x=40), and may be an allopolyploid result of past hybridization between S. bicolor and S. propinquum (Paterson et al. 1995). North American johnsongrass populations are often believed to contain pools of stable introgressants of wild plants and modern cultivated sorghum (Doggett 1988). In fact, Harlan (1992) suggested that crop-to-wild hybridization has likely been the key to the continued success and aggressiveness of johnsongrass in the United States, though there is no empirical evidence to support this idea.

The gene pools of the wild and cultivated sorghums can be described as unique, but not exclusive due to their common ancestry. Compatibility between these congeners has been well documented (see Hadley 1958). The likelihood of gene flow from crop to weeds is generally considered to be high. Crop sorghum outcrosses at rates as high as 15% (Ellstrand and Foster 1983), and the range of johnsongrass overlaps that of crop sorghum in all areas of cultivation in the US. Arriola and Ellstrand (1996) reported spontaneous weed x crop hybrid formation in the field at rates ranging from 0 - 12% and at distances of 0.5 - 100 meters. Subsequent measurements of hybrid fitness demonstrated no apparent fitness costs to the wild x crop hybrids when compared to the non-hybrid weeds under field conditions (Arriola and Ellstrand 1997). Although hybridization is variable, in this system one can regard the crop sorghum/johnsongrass complex as having a high probability of stable gene transfer in the wild.

The Rice – Wild Rice/Red Rice Complex (Prepared by David Gealy and Donna Mitten)
The two rice relatives, "wild rice" and "red rice" can mimic the cultivated crop and are considered to be weed problems in various parts of the world. Wild rice, O. rufipogon, is a separate species from domestic rice and is included on the USDA Federal Noxious Weed List. It has only been identified in the United States as a single patch in the Everglades, Florida and does not exist in any of the rice production regions (Vandiver 1992).

The second weed, red rice, is a variant or ecotype of domestic rice, O. sativa. It does not share the perennial nature of O. rufipogon and persists in cultivated rice fields primarily by having highly dormant seed. Seed banks of red rice can be long lived and management of the weed is often based upon depletion of the seed bank. The species can compete with commercial rice and, if not controlled, is considered a weed problem (Craigmiles 1979; Noldine 1998). Red rice mimics crop behavior and often causes reductions of crop yield and quality through the admixture of red grains with the harvest. Red rice has been described as a dominant competitor; in competition studies, as many as three crop rice plants were required to impact yield as much as one red rice plant (Pantone and Baker 1991).

Historically, it is believed red rice originated in the cultivated fields of India where both red and white rice were grown. Its introduction into the US is attributed to a seed mixture imported from the East Indian Seed Company. Red rice was established in the rice fields of the American colonists; in 1850, the USDA published reports that listed four red rice types (Craigmiles 1979). Strict quality standards for seed rice, combined with agricultural practices designed to deplete the red rice seed bank, have eliminated red rice populations from California and sections of the southeastern production area (Hill et al. 1994). Red rice populations continue to hybridize naturally with cultivated rice. Gene flow travels predominately from the cultivated crop into the weedy red rice population. Cultivation of early maturing commercial varieties provides a partial hybridization barrier to the later maturing red rice populations (Langevin et al. 1990). Although the pollination periods for red rice may be later than most of our currently cultivated rice varieties, red rice exhibits an uneven maturity in the panicle and can produce some seed capable of rapid germination. Thus red rice, allowed to produce seed in a commercial rice field, can shatter mature grains in advance of even the early harvested varieties.

Red rice can express a long seed dormancy when submerged and buried in the soil. In field studies of five red rice populations buried at three locations, red rice survived more than 6.5 years, however the length of seed survival varied with location and population (Goss and Brown 1939).

The wheat – jointed goatgrass/crested wheatgrass complex (Prepared by Marie Jasieniuk)
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is a hexaploid (2n = 42) with genomes A, B, and D (Kimber and Sears 1987). Although originally believed to be allopolyploid, polyploid wheats are more auto- than allopolyploid and behave cytologically like diploids, thus maintaining a high level of fertility and stability.

Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) is a major weed of winter wheat in the western United States (Dewey 1996). The species is believed to be indigenous to southern Europe and Russia (Gunn 1958; Donald and Ogg 1991). It was probably first introduced into the United States in contaminated winter wheat seed brought by settlers from the eastern Mediterranean region. Goatgrass is a tetraploid (2N=28) with genomes C and D (Donald and Ogg 1991). Jointed goatgrass and wheat share the D genome in common. The shared genome allows hybridization between the species in the field (Zemetra et al. 1998). Hybrids were once believed to be sterile, but two recent studies found hybrids in the field with viable seed (Mallory-Smith et al. 1996; Seefeldt et al. 1998). Hybrids were not self-fertile. Rather, hybrid plants exhibited a low level of female fertility (approximately 2%) that allowed for natural backcrossing to occur in the field (Zemetra et al. 1998). Greenhouse experiments indicated that percent seed set was similar with wheat or jointed goatgrass as the pollen parent, but that seed set and self-fertility in second generation backcrosses favored jointed goatgrass as the recurrent parent. Based on these results, only two crosses in the field after hybrid formation appear to be sufficient to recover partial self-fertility with jointed goatgrass as the recurrent parent (Zemetra et al. 1998). Thus, if the wheat that produced the hybrid carried a pest resistance gene on the D genome, it would be possible for the pest resistance trait to transfer to jointed goatgrass after only two backcross generations.

In addition to jointed goatgrass, intergeneric hybridization between spring wheat and crested wheatgrasses, Agropyron Gaertn. (sensu stricto), has been reported (Chen et al. 1989, 1990). The crested wheatgrasses constitute a perennial cross-pollinating complex of roughly 10 species with diploid (2n = 14), tetraploid (2n = 28), and hexaploid (2n = 42) forms built on what appears to be one basic genome, P (Dewey 1984; Chen et al. 1990). The species are indigenous to Eurasia but are now widely grown as economically important forage on arid rangelands in United States and Canada (Dewey 1983).

Intergeneric hybridization between wheat and four crested wheatgrasses, Agropyron mongolicum (2n = 14), A. cristatum (2n = 28), A. desertorum (2n = 28), and A. michnoi (2n = 28) has been documented (Chen et al. 1989, 1990). Hybrid seed set varied among wheatgrass species but was always low, ranging from 0.24 to 2.87% seed set. Crossability of diploid species was lower than that of polyploid species. Although most hybrid plants died of hybrid necrosis, a few plants were successfully established. Hybrid necrosis occurred at varying frequencies with different plant combinations suggesting that crossability varies among plants and accessions of a species. Backcross progeny of wheat x A. cristatum and wheat x A. michnoi hybrids were obtained by embryo rescue. Whether hybrids and backcross progeny occur naturally in the field is unknown.

References:

Arriola P and Ellstrand N. 1996. Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): Spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. American Journal of Botany 83(9): 1155-1160.

Arriola PE and Ellstrand NC. 1997. Fitness of interspecific hybrids in the genus Sorghum: Persistence of crop genes in wild populations. Ecological Applications 7: 512-518.

Bridges DC and Baumann PA. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. In Crop losses due to weeds in the United States - 1992. ed. DC Bridges, 75-147. Champaign, IL, USA: Weeds Science Society of America.

Chen Q, Jahier J, and Cauderon Y. 1989. Production and cytogenetical studies of hybrids between Triticum aestivum L. Thell. and Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. (3) 308:411-416.

Chen Q, Jahier J, and Cauderon Y. 1990. Intergeneric hybrids between Triticum aestivum and three crested wheatgrasses: Agropyron mongolicum, A. michnoi, and A. desertorum. Genome 33: 663-667.

Clegg MT, Giddings LV, Lewis CS, and Barton JH. 1993. Rice Biosafety. World Bank Technical Paper. Biotechnology Series No. 1, 37, plus attachments.

Cook RJ, Johnson VA, and Allen RE. 1993. Wheat. In Traditional crop breeding practices: A historical review to serve as a baseline for assessing the role of modern biotechnology, 27-36. Paris: OECD.

Dewey S. 1983. Historical and current taxonomic perspectives of Agropyron, Elymus and related genera. Crop Science 23:637-642.

Dewey S. 1984. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. In Gene manipulation in plant improvement, ed. JP Gustafson, 209-279. New York: Plenum Press.

Dewey S. 1996. Jointed goatgrass–an overview of the problem. In Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Jointed Goatgrass Conference, Pocatello, ID, 1-2. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

Doggett H. 1988. Sorghum. Essex, UK: Longman Scientific.

Donald W and Ogg A. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technology 5:3-17.

Goss WL and Brown E. 1939. Buried red rice seed. American Society of Agronomy 31: 633-637.

Gunn CR. 1958. The occurrence of Aegilops cylindrica Host. in Indiana and Kentucky. Castanea 23:14-19.

Hadley HH. 1958. Chromosome numbers, fertility and rhizome expression of hybrids between grain sorghum and johnsongrass. Agronomy Journal 50: 278-282.

Harlan J. 1992. Crops and man, 2d ed, 83-99. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America.

Heap I. 1998. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://weedscience.com.

Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, and Herberger JP. 1977. The world's worst weeds. Honolulu, USA: University Press of Hawaii.

Kaneda C. 1993. Rice in traditional crop breeding practices: A historical review to serve as a baseline for assessing the role of modern biotechnology, 37-46. Paris: OECD.

Kimber G and Sears ER. 1987. Evolution in the genus Triticum and the origin of cultivated wheat. In Wheat and wheat improvement, Agronomy Monograph no. 13, 2d ed., ed. EG Heyne, 154-164. Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.

Langevin SA, Clay K, and Grace JB. 1990. The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed red rice (Oryza sativa L.). Evolution 44: 1000-1008.

Mallory-Smith CA, Hansen J, and Zemetra RS. 1996. Gene transfer between wheat and Aegilops cylindrica. In Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, 441-445. Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology.

McKenzie KS, Johnson CW, Tseng ST, Oster JJ, and Brandon DM. 1994. Breeding improved rice cultivars for temperate regions: A case study. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 34: 897-905.

McWhorter GC. 1971. Introduction and spread of johnsongrass in the United States. Weed Science 19: 261-267.

Noldin J. 1998 Red Rice Situation and Management in the Americas. An international symposium on wild and weedy rices in agro-ecosystem, 36-41. Asian Pacific Weed Science Society.

Pantone DJ and Baker JB. 1991. Weed-crop competition models and response-surface analysis of red rice competition in cultivated rice: A review. Crop Science 31: 1105-1110.

Paterson AH, Schertz KF, Lin YR, Liu SC, and Chang YL. 1995. The weediness of wild plants: molecular analysis of genes responsible for dispersal and persistence of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 92: 6127-6131.

Ronald P. 1997. The molecular basis for disease resistance in rice. Plant Molecular Biology. 35: 179-186.

Seefeldt S, Zemetra R, Yound F, and Jones S. 1998. Production of herbicide resistant jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) x wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids in the field by natural hybridization. Weed Science 46:632-634.

Vandiver V, Hall D, and Westbrooks R. 1992. Discovery of Oryza rufipogon (Poaceae: Oryzeae), new to the United States, with its implications. SIDA 15(0):105-109.

Warwick SI. 1990. Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 169: 41-54.

Warwick SI, and Black LD. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 61. Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63: 997-1014.

Zemetra RS, Hansen J, and Mallory-Smith CA. 1998. Potential for gene transfer between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Science 46:3131-317.

1Group Report from the "Workshop on Ecological Effects of Pest Resistance Genes in Managed Ecosystems," in Bethesda, MD, January 31 - February 3, 1999. Sponsored by Information Systems for Biotechnology.