ENGINEERING FRUIT QUALITY VIA NOVEL GENETIC INTERVENTION
Autar K. Mattoo
In almost every sphere of life, quality is always better than just the quantity. That's perhaps one reason the present day scenario is more focused on quality time. As we prosper more, we want better things in our lives, of which improved food quality has highest priority. This is because we are becoming increasingly aware of the fact that we become what we eat and that our body does better with balanced food. Foods rich in vitamins, minerals, and fiber are naturally of significance to maintaining a healthy body. Thus, consumers hear more and more about recommendations for several courses per day of vegetables and fruits as part of our mealsseveral courses rather than just one because the levels of nutritive compounds in vegetables and fruits are much below the recommended daily allowance (RDA). Both the increasing awareness and the demand for high quality produce requires that scientists/agriculturists find the ways and means to enrich vegetables and fruits with value-added and health-beneficial compounds. The consumption of fresh produce in the US comprises at least 18% of the American diet (on fresh weight basis).
Quality is a combination of various desirable and economically significant attributes that make vegetables and fruits attractive and acceptable, such as size and shape, color, taste, flavor, gloss, presence of external and internal defects, texture, and softening. These attributes comprise complex parameters and are determined by a number of characteristics. For example, textural quality is determined, among other things, by fruit firmness or softness, fibrousness or toughness, succulence, and sensory qualities. A large number of cellular chemicals contribute to tomato aroma, while fruit taste is determined by acidity caused by organic acids and sugars. Thus, it is conceivable that each of these quality features is a result of highly regulated, multiple processes inherent in the commodity. Modern research has shown that most fruit quality attributes are controlled by sets of genes.
Many factors can negatively affect nutritive composition of a commodity, two of which are short shelf life and microbial infestation. Over-ripening, senescence, and physiological disorders, including chilling injury, are the major causes of post-harvest losses of fruit and vegetables. The genetic and biochemical bases of most of these processes remain to be explored. Losses during post-harvest storage are an economic drain and represent one of the greatest threats to a grower. For instance, tomato fruit decay during post-harvest results in a loss of 20% of marketed fruit, comprising the single greatest economic impact on tomato fruit commerce. Pathogen stress results in decay and development of off-flavor in fresh produce, rendering it unsuitable for consumption. To reduce the threatening impact of fruit rot,
chemical fungicides are extensively applied, often on a weekly basis. Most chemicals used to control microbial infestation are toxic and contribute to an unfriendly environment.
Our focus is on using basic biology underlying fruit/vegetable development and ripening/senescence to develop novel, high nutritive-quality and stress-tolerant vegetable and fruit germplasm for the fresh market and processing industries. To reach these goals, we are applying an integrative approach comprised of biochemistry, molecular genetics, and biotechnology, using tomato as a fruit/vegetable model. The development of novel and improved vegetable crops using genetic engineering technology holds great promise. This molecular approach has, in principle, opened the entire living kingdom as a source of genes for introgression into established cultivars, and at the same time made possible rapid transfer of individual genes from the resource population to a particular cultivar, or for the reinsertion of native loci in increased copy number after laboratory manipulation. Biotechnology can be
effectively applied in enhancing the nutritional quality of foodsfor example, it is desirable to decrease the levels of toxic metabolites like allergens and to increase the levels
of selected nutrients such as lycopene, polyamines, vitamin E, and glutathione, which work as anti-oxidants and decrease the risk of nutritional deficiencies.
Ripening of tomato fruit involves differentiation of chloroplast into chromoplasts, and most of the nutrients beneficial to human healthß-carotene, vitamin E, and lycopeneaccumulate in the chromoplasts. Careful genetic manipulation of processes or metabolites that can stabilize and maintain these chromoplasts in an anabolic state for a longer duration should allow development of transgenic plants with enhanced phytonutrient content. A major obstacle, however, in achieving these objectives is the limited basic information on genes of horticultural and economic importance, particularly since regulatory genes are expressed in low quantities, are highly regulated, and are expressed only in specific tissues at a specific time.
Plant growth, development, and senescence are regulated by a set of plant growth substances that function individually or in unison at specific stages in a plant's life. A set of these, such as auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, and brassinosteroids, are generally considered as promoters of growth and development, while methyl jasmonate, abscisic acid, and ethylene promote senescence and cell death. In addition to these plant hormones, polyamines have been implicated in cell division, embryogenesis, root formation, floral initiation and development, fruit development and ripening, pollen tube growth, and senescence. However, direct evidence for any physiological role(s) polyamines may have in plant growth, development, and senescence is just emerging. Polyamines are considered anti-senescence in nature and have been implicated in regulating or limiting the action of the pro-senescence hormone ethylene.
Ethylene is synthesized from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) by a sequential action of two key ethylene-biosynthesis enzymes, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase and ACC oxidase. Ethylene is a simple, gaseous hydrocarbon that acts as a dominant hormone in post-harvest physiology and senescence of plant organs. The last century witnessed the cloning and characterization of several ripening-specific gene transcripts, genetic analysis of the various single-gene ripening mutants of tomato, the identification and cloning of genes encoding for each step in ethylene biosynthesis, and identification of ethylene receptors.1 Genetic manipulation of one or more of these genes has contributed to the practical application of this knowledge to extend the shelf life of horticulturally-important crops.
Biosynthetic pathways for ethylene and polyamines in plants share SAM as a key intermediate. In this regard, it would appear that a plant cell has the potential to commit the flux of SAM either into polyamine biosynthesis, ethylene biosynthesis, or both.2 Polyamines are ubiquitous in flowering plants and mainly comprise putrescine, cadaverine, 1,3-diaminopropane, spermidine, and spermine; however, other modified forms are also known in plants. Putrescine is formed from either arginine via an intermediate agmatine, a reaction catalyzed by arginine decarboxylase (ADC), or from ornithine by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). Spermidine is synthesized from putrescine and the aminopropyl group donated by decarboxylated SAM, which is a product of SAM decarboxylation. In turn, spermidine incorporates another aminopropyl group (from decarboxylated SAM) to form spermine.3
To unambiguously demonstrate the role(s) of polyamines in the ripening process, whether through an effect on ethylene biosynthesis or ethylene action or other signals, my laboratory in collaboration with Prof. Avtar Handa of Purdue University (West Lafayette, Indiana) used a transgenic approach to accumulate polyamines at higher levels during ripening in tomato fruit. We reconstructed the yeast SAM decarboxylase (ySAMdc) gene4 by fusing it with a ripening-inducible promoter5 and introduced it into tomato plants using Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Segregation analysis indicated Mendelian inheritance of the gene. Among four independent lines found homozygous with the introduced ySAMdc gene, two were fully characterized. The two transgenic lines produced fruit with several-fold increases in the levels of spermidine and spermine, while the wild type and azygous lines showed a consistent decrease during ripening in these polyamines. The
accumulation of polyamines in the transgenic lines paralleled the accumulation of the ySAMdc transcripts. The effects of unusual accumulation of spermidine and spermine during ripening of the fruit resulted in delayed ripening of the fruit on the vine by two weeks, as compared to the fruit from the wild-type plants, and the juice quality was vastly improved.6 There was no marked change in the fruit yield between the lines.
Further, we found that the transgenic fruit we developed accumulated several-fold more of the carotenoid lycopene compared to the non-transformed fruit.6 Red tomato fruit color is primarily determined by lycopene content. Transformation of chloroplasts into chromoplasts during tomato fruit ripening leads to chlorophyll loss and increased content of carotenoids such as lycopene. Carotenoids are lipid soluble pigments found in chloroplast and chromoplast membranes.7 In addition to their role in photosynthetic reaction centers, they are essential for photoprotection. Moreover, they are also precursors of abscisic acid (ABA), a plant hormone that modulates developmental and stress processes. Polyamines are, among other processes, likely involved in stabilization of chromoplast function in plants.
Further investigation into this area should reveal novel regulation of plant metabolic processes, which may yet present us with new approaches to engineer metabolic pathways. These high polyamine-accumulating transgenic tomato lines are providing an excellent model system to investigate the role of polyamines in regulating gene expression, metabolism, growth, and development in plants and fruit ripening/senescence processes. For instance, we are investigating if polyamine accumulation results in changing the cellular redox systems due to their anti-oxidative nature, what processes are involved in polyamines-mediated stabilization of cellular membranes, which gene clusters are regulated by polyamines-mediated signaling, and how polyamines tilt the developmental balance towards anabolic from catabolic metabolism.
I thank my colleagues listed in the references for collaboration and stimulating research.
References
1. Fluhr R and Mattoo AK. 1996. Ethylene biosynthesis and perception. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 15: 479-523.
2. Cassol T and Mattoo AK. 2002. Do polyamines and ethylene interact to regulate plant growth, development and senescence? In: Molecular and Cellular Biology: New Trends (P. Nath, A. Mattoo, S. Ranade and J. Weil, eds.), SMPS Publishers, Dehradun, India.
3. Cohen SS. 1998. A Guide to the Polyamines. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 595.
4. Kashiwagi K, Teneja SK, Liu TY, Tabor CW, and Tabor H. 1990. Spermidine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosynthesis and processing of a proenzyme form of
S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265: 22321-22328.
5. Giovannoni JJ, DellaPenna D, Bennett AB, and Fischer RL. 1989. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato results in
polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. The Plant Cell 1: 53-63.
6. Mehta RA, Cassol T, Li N, Ali N, Handa AK, and Mattoo AK. 2002. Engineered polyamine accumulation in tomato enhances phytonutrient content, juice quality, and vine life. Nature Biotechnology 20: 613-618.
7. Bartley GE and Scolnik PA. 1994. Molecular biology of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 45: 287-301.
Autar K. Mattoo
USDA-ARS
Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Ag. Res. Ctr., Maryland
mattooa@ba.ars.usda.gov

THE FINGERS OF GENE REGULATION IN PLANTS
Roger N. Beachy and M. Isabel Ordiz
The machinery that controls gene expression in all organisms consists of a series of intracellular processes in which specific proteins, broadly referred to as transcription factors, play a significant role. Transcription factors have a modular structure: a DNA binding domain which targets the protein to specific DNA sequence(s); and a regulatory domain that acts to increase or decrease transcription of the gene(s) that contains the DNA binding domain.
Of all transcription factors, zinc finger-containing proteins are the most abundant in nature. It is estimated that 700 genes encode such factors in humans, while the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana contains about 85 genes of this class. Natural zinc finger proteins contain three zinc finger domains. Each single domain contains 30 amino acids that create a structure of two ß-sheets and one a-helix (bba), stabilized by hydrophobic interactions and the presence of a single zinc ion. The a-helix structure facilitates the interaction of the protein with three nucleotides (triplet). Polydactil six-zinc finger proteins that recognize eighteen consecutive nucleotides have been artificially engineered, thus creating a protein that is highly specific for 18 nucleotides.
By combining the binding characteristics of a synthetic six-zinc finger with a regulator domain, e.g., the herpes simplex virus VP16 activation domain, we explored the use of zinc finger technology in plants to control the expression of novel and endogenous genes.
In our experiments, we used a well-characterized six-zinc finger protein, 2C7-protein, and its DNA recognition sequence. To measure the interaction of the two elements, ß-glucuronidase reporter genes that contained the 2C7 DNA binding site were constructed and introduced to cells along with genes encoding the 2C7 proteins. In tobacco protoplasts, there was significant induction of reporter gene expression, subject to a variety of conditions. 1 For example, the expression of the reporter gene was dependent on the distance between the 2C7 sites and TATA box of the reporter gene construct. The addition of the herpes simplex virus VP16 activation domain or a four times repeat of the minimal activation domain from VP16 (referred to as VP64) to the 2C7 protein increased expression of the reporter gene from 5 to 30 fold in tobacco protoplasts. In transgenic plants, expression of the reporter gene increased by as much as 450 fold.1
In related experiments, the zinc finger activator protein was expressed from a phloem-specific promoter in transgenic plants that also contained a reporter gene construct. In these plants, the reporter gene was expressed only in the vascular tissues. Expression of the transgenes was stably inherited.1
Stege and colleagues used a viral vector (based on tobacco mosaic virus) to test a variety of gene constructs in transient assays in BY-2 tobacco and maize protoplasts. The results of these studies indicate that the system can be useful in monocot as well as dicot cells. The use of C7 proteins that contain three-zinc fingers resulted in a higher level of gene activation (by about 4x) when compared with 2C7 six-zinc finger proteins. The authors suggested that the smaller DNA binding site might increase the occupancy of the protein on the C7 binding site.2
This paper also analyzed the effect of several known repressor domains (e.g., KRAB-A and SID) in this assay system. The KRAB-A domain of the Kruppel-associated box-A domain is known to act at the level of chromatin modification and remodeling; the mode of action of mSin3 (SID repressor domain) of the human MAD1 protein is not known. When attached to the six-zinc finger protein, the KRAB domain caused no specific repression of the reporter gene in the tobacco protoplasts; in contrast, the SID domain exhibited a 5-fold level of repression.
These data confirmed that it is possible to increase as well as decrease the expression of exogenous genes in plants using synthetic six-zinc finger proteins, thereby opening the possibility of controlling endogenous genes in plants.
To explore that possibility of regulating a native gene, Guan and colleagues developed a synthetic six-zinc finger protein that binds to a specific sequence upstream of the promoter of the Arabidopsis thaliana AP3 gene; AP3 controls floral organ identity.3 The effect of the zinc finger protein was tested with a reporter gene comprising the AP3 promoter and the ß-glucuronidase open reading frame. The positive or negative effect of the factor was mediated by the fusion of the zinc finger proteins with an activator (VP64) or repressor (SID) domain, under control of the AP1 promoter. The AP1 promoter is expressed throughout young floral primordia and in sepal and petal primordia in mature flowers. Plants co-transfected with the recognition sequence (AP3::GUS) and the activator protein (AP1::ZFPAP3-VP64) showed expression of ß-glucuronidase in all primordia and in petals and sepals in later stages in a manner similar to the expression of AP1. Some plants had five or more petals and a reduced number of sepals; the stamens were normal and fertile.
In plants that contain the repressor protein AP1::Sid-ZFPAP3 the ß-glucuronidase was expressed in stamens only. Petals in some flowers were absent and some were converted to sepals; these plants were fertile. When a constitutive promoter (UBQ3) was fused to the repressor protein, most of the plants were sterile, the petals were narrower and shorter than normal, and stamens were reduced in size with respect to the normal plant. The phenotype of these plants was similar to the phenotype previously described for ap3 and
sap mutants. These characteristics were transmitted to the progeny in at least two consecutive generations,3 confirming that the zinc finger regulatory proteins can continue to exert their regulatory effect, as do endogenous regulatory genes.
The possibilities of using synthetic proteins to regulate at will the expression of endogenous genes will have many applications, including the study of gene function, in regulating the expression of novel genes and developing novel pathways for controlling expression of genes in plants, as well as other organisms. Clearly, the targeted application of this technology opens a wide range of possibilities in plant science and agricultural biotechnology.
References
1. Ordiz MI, Barbas CF III, and Beachy RN. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13290-13295.
2. Stege J, Guan X, Ho T, Beachy RN, and Barbas CF III. 2002. Plant Journal (in press).
3. Guan X, Stege J, Kim M, Dahmani Z, Fan N, Heifetz P, Barbas CF III, and Briggs SP. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13296-13301.
Roger N. Beachy, President
M. Isabel Ordiz, Post-doctoral Associate
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center
St. Louis, MO
RnBeachy@danforthcenter.org
