Section II. Regulation and Oversight of GMOs

TRANSGENIC PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL guidelines, regulations, and rules pertaining to their containment, movement, and release into the environment. In addition, a few states, notably Florida and California, have applicable regulations as well. Institutions where biotechnology research is conducted are expected to have an institutional biosafety committee (IBC) serving as the local authority. Ultimately, responsibility for the safe handling of transgenic materials lies with the principal investigator and other individuals who manage any part of the research.


THE NIH GUIDELINES AND APPENDIX P

Guidelines first published by the NIH in 1976 address the safe conduct of laboratory research involving the construction and handling of rDNA molecules and organisms containing rDNA. They are advisory in nature, rather than legally binding. However, all federal agencies that support or conduct rDNA research agreed to abide by the NIH Guidelines and require institutional compliance as a condition of funding. Thus, failure to comply may result in the suspension, limitation, or termination of financial support for rDNA research at the institution. The current version of the NIH Guidelines can be accessed on the Internet4.

The NIH Guidelines discuss risk assessment and recommend containment measures for various biological experiments. They set forth facility specifications and practices for conducting experiments classified according to four levels of biosafety containment; a fifth class encompasses experiments that are exempt. Although originally focused on rDNA microorganisms, the NIH Guidelines have undergone numerous revisions and now cover plant, animal, and human gene therapy research to accommodate the wide range of federally funded research projects.

The Guidelines were expanded in 1994 by the addition of Appendix P, Physical and Biological Containment for Recombinant DNA Research Involving Plants. The term "plants" includes, but is not limited to, mosses, liverworts, macroscopic algae, and vascular plants including terrestrial crop, forest, weed, and ornamental species. Recommended containment conditions for experiments involving plants together with plant-associated microorganisms or small animals in which any organism may be genetically modified are also found in Appendix P.

Plant-associated microorganisms include those known to cause plant disease, such as viroids, virusoids, viruses, bacteria, and fungi, as well as protozoa, and microorganisms that have a benign or beneficial association with plants, such as certain Rhizobium species. Microorganisms that are modified with the objective of fostering an association with plants are similarly subject to the terms of Appendix P. Plant-associated small animals include those arthropods that: (1) are in obligate association with plants; (2) are plant pests; (3) are plant pollinators; or (4) transmit plant disease agents, as well as other small animals such as nematodes for which tests of biological properties necessitate the use of plants. Microorganisms associated with such small animals (e.g., pathogens or symbionts) are included.

Appendix P describes practices for conducting experiments to construct, use experimentally, and propagate genetically engineered plants. It specifies physical and biological containment measures and management protocols applicable to each of four biosafety levels designated BL1-P, the lowest level of containment, through BL4-P, the highest level.


FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES

Under the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology, three US governmental agencies regulate GMOs: the Department of Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency,

and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Greenhouse research is not generally subject to

federal regulation; however, the following brief summary provides the broad context for regulatory review of transgenic plants associated with testing in the environment and commercialization. More complete information about these agencies and their roles with respect to products derived from biotechnology, with links to the laws, rules, and regulations that they administer, can be accessed at the US Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology site on the Web5.

USDA/APHIS

The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has authority under the Federal Plant Pest Act to protect US agriculture from pests and diseases. Under the Coordinated Framework, this authority was extended to cover rDNA-containing plants and other potential plant pests. USDA also regulates veterinary biologics such as recombinant vaccines. The Plant Protection and Quarantine division is the lead regulatory office for GMOs. APHIS also adheres to international standards created by the International Plant Protection Convention. Any introduction of a GMO, defined as importation, interstate movement, or release to the environment, requires either notification to APHIS or application for a release permit, depending on the nature of the plant and the genetic modification made to it. APHIS has an extensive biotechnology Web site describing their regulations6.

EPA

The EPA regulates the use of two categories of GMOs. The first encompasses novel microorganisms (formed by deliberate combinations of genetic material from different taxonomic genera) that contain or express new combinations of traits and are intended for commercial use as biofertilizers, biosensors, waste treatment or pollutant degradation, or for commodity or specialty chemical production. The second category consists of plants and microbes producing pesticidal substances, such as plants expressing insect control proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). More information on these topics is available through the EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act Biotechnology Program7and their Biopesticides Program8.

FDA

Commercial products modified by genetic engineering for human and animal consumption,

food additives, human and veterinary drugs are subject to regulation by the FDA. Their oversight does not apply to the R&D phases of product improvement. Nevertheless, developers are expected to consult with the FDA during the development phase for guidance on what types of data will be needed at the time of product safety review. An overview of the FDA's policies on food and feed from GM plants can be found on the Internet9.

Table 1 shows a concise overview of USDA's, EPA's and FDA's overlapping regulatory authorities.

TABLE 1. Multiple Regulatory authorities oversee certain GMOs
NEW TRAIT/ORGANISMREGULATORY REVIEW
CONDUCTED BY:
REVIEWED FOR:
Viral Resistance in food crop USDA
EPA
FDA
Safe to grow
Safe for the environment
Safe to eat
Herbicide Tolerance in food crop USDA
EPA
FDA
Safe to grow
New use of companion herbicide
Safe to eat
Herbicide Tolerance in ornamental crop USDA
EPA
Safe to grow
New use of companion herbicide
Modified Oil Content in food crop USDA
FDA
Safe to grow
Safe to eat
Modified Flower Color in ornamental crop USDA Safe to grow
Modified Pollutant Degrading soil bacteria EPA Safe for the environment


INSTITUTIONAL BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE

Any institution where research involving transgenic organisms is conducted and which receives federal funding for research is required to appoint an Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). The committee is to consist of at least five persons, two of whom are "citizen members" not affiliated with the institution. Preferably they are familiar with biosafety issues and have a demonstrated commitment to the surrounding community, especially as it pertains to human and environmental protection. Local government officials, state environmental agency staff, or persons in the medical, occupational health or environmental areas are among those individuals suitable for IBC membership. The committee should also include at least one member having expertise in plant, plant pathogen, or plant pest containment principles.

The IBC reviews recombinant DNA research programs or proposals and confirms the research leader's assignment of the appropriate containment level for the proposed work. Commonly the IBC first considers the proper containment level for the unmodified organism, and then considers whether or not the proposed change to the organism could increase, decrease, or leave unchanged the organism's necessary containment level. The Committee ensures compliance with the NIH Guidelines by evaluating facilities, procedures, and the expertise of personnel involved in the research. In addition, the IBC is responsible for adopting emergency plans for responding to an accidental release from containment. To facilitate timely disposal of residual transgenic experimental materials, the IBC may adopt a closeout policy that provides the project leader with written notice of project termination dates. The Committee is responsible for maintaining and/or verifying documentation of rDNA research at the institution, and acts as a point of contact for NIH and other agencies.


BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICER

If research is conducted on organisms that require special containment conditions designated as BL3-P or BL4-P (described later), or if large-scale microbial research is conducted, a Biological Safety Officer (BSO) must be appointed. This person, who also serves on the IBC, acts as a technical liaison between researchers and the IBC, develops emergency plans, and periodically inspects facilities and protocols. Because higher containment levels require more scrutiny, the BSO serves as an additional contact beyond the IBC.


PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

The Principal Investigator (PI) ultimately is responsible for the research project and for ensuring compliance with biosafety standards. The PI functions as a project manager as well as a researcher, bearing responsibility for training and supervising personnel, communicating with the IBC, BSO, greenhouse manager and staff, and correcting any operations that may result in a loss of containment. Based on the nature of the transgenic organism, the PI determines the proper containment level for the project and, in accordance with the NIH Guidelines, develops the necessary experimental protocols; he submits this information to the IBC for review.

For all experiments to be conducted with plants, the Principal Investigator must file a notification document with the IBC. Notification is made either at the time the work is initiated or prior to the start of the experiment, depending on the level of containment required. In some cases, the investigator may need to obtain further approvals before initiation, in addition to that of the IBC. Details of approval requirements are given in Section III of the NIH Guidelines. The IBC can assist the PI in obtaining requisite approvals.


GREENHOUSE STAFF

Greenhouse staff may range in experience from part time student workers who water plants to skilled tradesmen who maintain the facility's structure and mechanical systems. Regardless of individual duties, all staff should become familiar with any differences between caring for GMOs and conventional plants that may affect their own work. In most cases, a brief orientation session is sufficient to explain the nature of the plants (or other transgenic organisms) and any special practices to be employed when handling or working around them. For example, where transgenic microbes are being tested for their ability to associate with roots, the PI may require that runoff from watering is collected and treated prior to disposal. Both the greenhouse manager and the PI should work with the staff to ensure compliance with safety procedures and standards.


4 http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/rac/guidelines/guidelines.html

5 http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotech/OECD/usregs.htm

6 http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/bp

7 http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/biotech/index.html

8 http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/

9 http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/biotechm.html